Introduction: What is Sola Scriptura?

The doctrine of Sola Scriptura—Latin for "Scripture alone"—is a foundational principle of many Protestant denominations. It asserts that the Bible alone is the sole, sufficient, and final authority in matters of faith and practice. While this doctrine aims to honor God’s Word, it dismisses the necessity of Church Tradition and authority, often leading to doctrinal chaos and fragmentation.

One notable example is the World Mission Society Church of God (WMSCOG), which claims to rely on the Bible alone while advancing unique doctrines, such as their belief in Ahnsahnghong as the prophet Elijah and “Mother God.” This is a product of private interpretation masquerading as "Bible-only" Christianity, demonstrating the dangers of rejecting the Church's interpretive authority. This article delves into the flaws of Sola Scriptura, the biblical and historical basis for Church Tradition and authority, and the consequences of rejecting this foundation.

Part 1: The Flaws of Sola Scriptura

Sola Scriptura contains inherent contradictions and practical issues that undermine its validity.

1. Sola Scriptura is Self-Contradictory

The Bible Does Not Teach Sola Scriptura

Ironically, the doctrine of Sola Scriptura is not found in Scripture itself. The Bible never claims to be the sole authority for Christians.

• 2 Timothy 3:16-17:

  "All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work."

  • While this passage affirms the authority and sufficiency of Scripture, it does not claim exclusivity. Paul does not reject oral Tradition or the Church’s authority here.

Scripture Points to Other Authorities

• 1 Timothy 3:15:

  "The Church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth."

  • This verse designates the Church—not Scripture alone—as the pillar of truth.

2. The Canon of Scripture Requires Church Authority

The Bible Does Not Define Its Own Canon

The Bible does not contain a list of the books that belong in it. Determining the canon required the authority of the early Church, guided by the Holy Spirit.

• Historical Development:

  The canon of the New Testament was discerned by Church councils, such as Hippo (AD 393) and Carthage (AD 397). Protestants accept this canon while rejecting the Church’s authority that defined it.

• Inconsistencies in Protestant Practice:

  The rejection of the deuterocanonical books (e.g., Wisdom, Sirach) by many Protestant groups highlights the arbitrary nature of their reliance on a canon determined by the Catholic Church.